In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inferring that we will generally adopt the Board’s recommended sanction if the decision is unanimous
• addressing the contention that the pertinent rule was “unconstitutionally vague, [thereby] violating [the attorney’s] constitutional due process rights’’
• interpreting Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) 4.2(a) using traditional statutory interpretation tools
• interpreting Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) 4.2(a) using traditional statutory interpretation tools
• reprimanding a licensed attorney acting pro se for violating an RPC
• “While the Rules of Professional Conduct are only ‘quasi-criminal,’ the rule of lenity applies to both criminal and quasi-criminal statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haley

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haley
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-07-27· cited 8×