In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) 4.2(a) using traditional statutory interpretation tools
• interpreting Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) 4.2(a) using traditional statutory interpretation tools
• reprimanding a licensed attorney acting pro se for violating an RPC
• “While the Rules of Professional Conduct are only ‘quasi-criminal,’ the rule of lenity applies to both criminal and quasi-criminal statutes.”
• “[W]e hold that a lawyer acting pro se is ‘representing a client’ for purposes of [the no-contact rule].”
• \[W]e hold that a lawyer acting pro se is 'representing a client' for purposes of [Rule] 4.2[a].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).