· 2/20/2007
Randolph v. ING Life Insurance & Annuity Co.
Citations
- 486 F. Supp. 2d 1
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11523
- 2007 WL 565872
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he ‘lost data’ cases . . . clearly reject the theory that a plaintiff is entitled to reimbursement for credit monitoring services or for time and money spent monitoring his or her credit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.