Skip to main content
· 2/20/2007

Randolph v. ING Life Insurance & Annuity Co.

Citations

  • 486 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11523
  • 2007 WL 565872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he ‘lost data’ cases . . . clearly reject the theory that a plaintiff is entitled to reimbursement for credit monitoring services or for time and money spent monitoring his or her credit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.