Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court-supervised funds for medical monitoring for mass-exposure toxic torts cases best serve public health interests
• holding that court-supervised funds for medical monitoring for mass-exposure toxic torts cases best serve public health interests
• concluding that a plaintiff exposed to toxins may recover for fear of contracting cancer in absence of present injury only when cancer is more likely than not to develop
• holding that court-supervised funds for medical monitoring for mass-exposure toxic torts cases best serve public health interests
• holding that court-supervised funds for medical monitoring for mass-exposure toxic torts cases best serve public health interests
• holding that IIED cause of action requires intention of causing, or knowing and reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress to the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).