Ruffolo v. Oppenheimer & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend, a conclusion “confirmed by [the court’s] review of the proposed amended complaint,” which did not allege facts sufficient to state a claim
• affirming dismissal with prejudice “[w]here it appears that granting leave to amend is unlikely to be productive, . . .”
• affirming dismissal with prejudice where plaintiff had an opportunity to amend, rendering further amendment “futile”
• affirming dismissal with prejudice because, “[w]here it appears that granting leave to amend is unlikely to be productive, . . . it is not an abuse of [the district court's] discretion to deny leave to amend”
• affirming dismissal with prejudice because, “[w]here it appears that granting leave to amend is unlikely to be productive, . . . it is not an abuse of the [district court’s] discretion to deny leave to amend”
• affirming dismissal with prejudice because, “[w]here it appears that granting leave to amend is unlikely to be productive, . . . it is not an abuse of [the district court’s] discretion to deny leave to amend”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ruotolo v. City of New York
  Second Circuit· 2008-02-06· cited 1,344×
• Edward E. Lucente, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 2002-11-04· cited 951×
• Grace v. Rosenstock
  Second Circuit· 2000-08-25· cited 198×
• Conboy v. AT & T Corp.
  Second Circuit· 2001-02-26· cited 140×
• Apotex Inc. v. Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2016-05-16· cited 139×
• In Re American Express Company Shareholder Litigation
  Second Circuit· 1994-11-01· cited 138×
• Dan Marchi v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Albany, Schoharie, Schenectady, and Saratoga Counties
  Second Circuit· 1999-04-02· cited 132×
• Davila v. Lang
  S.D. Illinois· 2018-10-23· cited 119×
• Krumme v. Westpoint Stevens Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1998-05-01· cited 115×
• Fisk v. Letterman
  S.D. New York· 2005-11-17· cited 100×
• Richard J. MacKensworth v. S.S. American Merchant
  Second Circuit· 1994-06-16· cited 88×
• Tafari v. McCarthy
  N.D. New York· 2010-05-24· cited 85×
• Blaskiewicz v. County of Suffolk
  E.D. New York· 1998-12-07· cited 81×
• A v. by Versace, Inc. v. Gianni Versace, S.P.A.
  S.D. New York· 2000-03-06· cited 74×
• Laface v. E. Suffolk Boces
  E.D. New York· 2018-11-15· cited 65×
• Oneida Indian Nation of New York State v. County of Oneida
  N.D. New York· 2000-09-25· cited 59×
• Shell v. Brzezniak
  W.D. New York· 2005-04-21· cited 55×
• Official Committee of Unsecured, Creditors v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In Re M. Fabrikant & Sons, Inc.)
  S.D. New York· 2008-10-10· cited 52×
• Black Radio Network, Inc. v. Nynex Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1999-04-30· cited 45×
• Semper v. New York Methodist Hospital
  E.D. New York· 2011-03-30· cited 44×