Skip to main content
· 6/16/1994

Richard J. MacKensworth v. S.S. American Merchant

Citations

  • 28 F.3d 246
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 487
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15186
  • 1994 WL 273129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that undue delay, bad faith, or futility of an amendment are valid grounds for denying leave to amend
  • noting that undue delay, bad faith, or futility of an amendment are valid grounds for denying leave to amend
  • noting that “undue delay, bad faith, or futility of [an] amendment” are valid grounds for denying leave to amend
  • noting an agreement to “provide a Letter of Undertaking as substitute security for the lien asserted by [the plaintiff] in his in 45 See supra note 9. In addition, defendants have not moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under FRCP 12(b)(2
  • \Subject matter jurisdiction in an in rem action in admiralty lies in the district court where the vessel or other res is located.\
  • “Subject matter jurisdiction in an in rem action in admiralty lies in the district court where the vessel or other res is located.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Kearse, Cardamone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.