MD Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding an agency’s decision not to include confidential business information in the public record of a licensing hearing
• upholding an agency’s decision not to include confidential business information in' the public record of a licensing hearing
• explaining the standard of judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. s 706(2)(A), (E)
• directing the court to determine whether the agency “examined the relevant data and articulated a satisfactory explanation for its action including a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made”
• upholding agency’s decision as it “gave an explanation for its decision” and “[t]aken as a whole, [the agency’s] explanation demonstrates that it examined the data, considered the relevant factors, and made a reasonable judgment based on the record.”
• There is no requirement “that a defendant must be allowed to put on 17 any evidence he chooses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).