· 5/21/1996
F.D.R. Fox v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 83 F.3d 1491
- 317 U.S. App. D.C. 443
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11527
- 1996 WL 264519
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating speech which does not contain “trumped-up, scattershot claims of misbehavior” does not lose its First Amendment protection as an “employee grievance” under Connick
- D. C. Lottery Board security officer fired after informing the police about a theft made possible by \rather drastic managerial ineptitude\
- D. C. Lottery Board security officer fired after informing the police about a theft made possible by “rather drastic managerial ineptitude”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams, Ginsburg, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.