Arizona Supreme Court· 4/29/2021

R.S./s.E. v. Hon. thompson/teddy Vanders

Citations

251 Ariz. 111
485 P.3d 1068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing the need for full disclosure of all facts to maintain the integrity of the judiciary despite having no general constitutional right to discovery
noting that a “defendant who offers a defense of justification should be permitted to introduce evidence of specific acts of violence . . . if the defendant either observed the acts himself or was informed of the acts before the [incident]” (internal quotation marks omitted)
“A crime victim’s right to refuse a discovery request generally includes the right to refuse to disclose medical records.”
defendant seeking privileged mental health records must make “requisite constitutional showing” to overcome victim’s right to refuse disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.