Skip to main content
· 9/24/2014

State of New Jersey in the Interest of A.B.

Citations

  • 219 N.J. 542
  • 99 A.3d 782
  • 2014 N.J. LEXIS 909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that in a sexual assault case, the complaining witness’s family desired to “not to suffer the traumatizing effect of the [defendant’s] presence in their in them home”
  • recognizing the right of a purported victim and her family to privacy
  • recognizing the right of a purported victim and her family to privacy
  • noting request to inspect victim’s home fell outside scope of automatic discovery in Rule 3:13-3(b) because home was not within “possession, custody or control” of prosecutor
  • reviewing discovery orders under an abuse of discretion standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Albin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.