Skip to main content
· 11/2/1995

State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 908 P.2d 37
  • 184 Ariz. 223
  • 202 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 77
  • 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 249

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In most cases an effective screening mechanism will satisfy the defendant’s interests and permit implementation of the policy change underlying ER 1.11(c).”
  • “The inquiry under ER 1.11(c) is whether the attorney personally and substantially participated in the matter for which the prosecutor is seeking to hold the defendant accountable.”
  • noting features of effective screening process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sult, Ehrlich, Weisberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.