Roy v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[d]efendant’s contention concerning defenses, including whether exemptions from overtime apply, ‘tread too deeply into the merits and are premature without knowing who the actual class members will be’” (quoting Roberts, 2017 WL 1217114, at )
• stating that FLSA does not authorize nationwide service of process, so the Fourteenth Amendment and state law set the limits on the court’s exercise of federal jurisdiction
• stating that FLSA does not authorize nationwide service of process, so the Fourteenth Amendment and state law set the limits on the court’s exercise of federal jurisdiction
• finding that the defendant’s joint-employer argument “involve[d] fact-intensive inquiries that should not be addressed on this undeveloped record and are more appropriate for consideration at stage two of the collective action certification process”
• declining to add language to the notice regarding opt-in plaintiffs’ potential costs and litigation obligations
• “District courts generally have extended the specific jurisdiction principles articulated in Bristol-Myers to the analysis of personal jurisdiction over named plaintiffs in federal class actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• David Camp and Keith Hadmack, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. and Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution, LLC, Defendants
  D. New Hampshire· 2020-04-07· cited 1×
• David Tuck v. P Gene Shroyer, et al.
  D. New Hampshire· 2022-11-30· cited 1×

Cites

76 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
  Supreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 12,253×
• Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
• World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 8,668×
• Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
• Daimler AG v. Bauman
  Supreme Court· 2014-01-14· cited 4,713×
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 4,653×
• Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-27· cited 4,319×
• Walden v. Fiore
  Supreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 3,814×
• Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
• Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.
  Supreme Court· 2017-06-19· cited 2,355×
• Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling
  Supreme Court· 1990-01-09· cited 1,715×
• Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1987-12-08· cited 1,419×
• Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk
  Supreme Court· 2013-04-16· cited 1,227×
• Messner v. Northshore University HealthSystem
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-01-13· cited 591×
• Arthur F. Sawtelle, Etc. v. George E. Farrell
  First Circuit· 1995-12-05· cited 587×
• BNSF Ry. Co. v. Tyrrell
  Supreme Court· 2017-05-30· cited 540×
• Devlin v. Scardelletti
  Supreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 482×
• Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox Canada
  First Circuit· 1995-02-09· cited 449×
• Richard A. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A. Ronald L. Motley, Scruggs, Millette, Bozeman & Dent P.A. Richard F. Scruggs
  First Circuit· 2002-06-17· cited 432×
• United States v. Swiss American Bank, Ltd.
  First Circuit· 2001-12-27· cited 427×