Skip to main content

Rowe v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.

Citations

  • 917 A.2d 767
  • 189 N.J. 615
  • 2007 N.J. LEXIS 334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the choice-of-law question is not which state has the better law; inquiry is limited to which 55 A-1387-14T3 state has greater interest in applying its law to the claims
  • when suit filed in New Jersey, we \subscribe to the . . . governmental-interests analysis\
  • decided by five Justices plus Judges Stern and Steven L. Lefelt, temporarily assigned
  • decided by five Justices plus Judges Stern and Steven L. Lefelt, temporarily assigned
  • “To allow a lifelong Michigan resident who received an FDA-approved drug in Michigan and alleges injuries sustained in Michigan to bypass his own state’s law ... overvalues] [New Jersey’s] true interest in this litigation.”
  • “To allow a life-long Michigan resident who received an FDA-approved drug in Michigan and alleges injuries sustained in Michigan to by-pass his own state’s law ... overvalues] [New Jersey’s] true interest in this litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Long, Lavecchia, Wallace, Rivera-Soto, Hoens, Lefelt, Stern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.