· 3/16/1984
Deemer v. Silk City Textile MacH. Co.
Citations
- 475 A.2d 648
- 193 N.J. Super. 643
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that New Jersey courts have abandoned “mechanical application” of lex loci delicti doctrine in favor of “govemmental interest approach” in choice-of-law questions
- finding North Carolina law applied to product liability claim where plaintiff suffered injury in North Carolina, but where the product was manufactured in New Jersey by a manufacturer organized in New Jersey
- finding North Carolina law applied to product liability claim where plaintiff suffered injury in North Carolina, but where the product was manufactured in New Jersey by a manufacturer organized in New Jersey
- products liability action where plaintiff was North Carolina resident but product was designed and manufactured in New Jersey
- Plaintiffs, North Carolina residents, could not receive benefit of New Jersey product liability law where a vehicle was purchased in North Carolina and accident occurred there.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Michels, King and Dreier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.