Skip to main content
· 3/16/1984

Deemer v. Silk City Textile MacH. Co.

Citations

  • 475 A.2d 648
  • 193 N.J. Super. 643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that New Jersey courts have abandoned “mechanical application” of lex loci delicti doctrine in favor of “govemmental interest approach” in choice-of-law questions
  • finding North Carolina law applied to product liability claim where plaintiff suffered injury in North Carolina, but where the product was manufactured in New Jersey by a manufacturer organized in New Jersey
  • finding North Carolina law applied to product liability claim where plaintiff suffered injury in North Carolina, but where the product was manufactured in New Jersey by a manufacturer organized in New Jersey
  • products liability action where plaintiff was North Carolina resident but product was designed and manufactured in New Jersey
  • Plaintiffs, North Carolina residents, could not receive benefit of New Jersey product liability law where a vehicle was purchased in North Carolina and accident occurred there.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Michels, King and Dreier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.