Roush v. Roush
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 840
Syllabus
Domestic relations court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for new trial because the court's specific findings in divorce decree were supported by competent credible evidence, and award of attorney fees was not unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable. Court did not abuse its discretion by finding appellant in contempt for failing to comply with divorce decree because clear and convincing evidence demonstrated that appellant was aware of applicable provisions of decree and failed to comply. Court did not abuse its discretion by awarding additional attorney fees related to contempt proceedings, because the court considered the statutory factors and found additional attorney fee award to be warranted.
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Habtemariam v. WorkuOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-21· cited 13×
- Sangeri v. YerraOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-03· cited 9×
- Iranpour-Boroujeni v. EmamiOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-03· cited 5×
- Roush v. RoushOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-21· cited 4×
- Moore v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-02· cited 4×
- Hetzner v. HetznerOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-31· cited 3×
- Carter v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-22· cited 3×
- Deitz v. DeitzOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-30· cited 2×
- Sangeri v. YerraOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-01· cited 1×
- Johnson v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-03· cited 1×
- Ryan v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-05· cited 1×
- Wilkes v. WilkesOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-25· cited 1×
- Jackson v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-16
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.