Skip to main content

Roush v. Roush

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 840

Syllabus

Domestic relations court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for new trial because the court's specific findings in divorce decree were supported by competent credible evidence, and award of attorney fees was not unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable. Court did not abuse its discretion by finding appellant in contempt for failing to comply with divorce decree because clear and convincing evidence demonstrated that appellant was aware of applicable provisions of decree and failed to comply. Court did not abuse its discretion by awarding additional attorney fees related to contempt proceedings, because the court considered the statutory factors and found additional attorney fee award to be warranted.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.