Skip to main content

Deitz v. Deitz

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8354
  • 99 N.E.3d 997

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding defendant-appellant in contempt of court for failing to provide plaintiff-appellee the dependency-exemption form. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding plaintiff-appellee attorney fees associated with the contempt finding. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by reallocating the dependency exemption. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant-appellant's motion for attorney fees because she failed to voluntarily dismiss the motion under Civ.R. 41(A).

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.