SAIf Corp. v. Alton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• preponderance of evidence standard of proof applies to establishing compensability of an injury or occupational disease claim
• “The claimant must meet his or her burden by a preponderance of the medical evidence.”
• “The claimant must meet his or her burden [of proving compensability] by a preponderance of the medical evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blank v. US Bank
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 5×
• SAIF Corp. v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 5×
• Liberty M & Saif Corp. v. Lynch Co. (In re Comp. of Alcorn)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-30· cited 3×
• Sheldon v. US Bank
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 1×
• Hanson v. Dan's Steel Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-17

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-29· cited 94×
• Uris v. State Compensation Department
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1967-05-17· cited 90×
• Rolfe v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-09-08· cited 20×
• Freightliner Corp. v. Arnold
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-03· cited 12×
• SAIF Corp. v. Calder
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-18· cited 11×
• Barnett v. Saif Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-04· cited 10×
• SAIF Corp. v. Danboise
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-04-23· cited 7×
• SAIF Corp. v. Gaffke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-04· cited 4×