Martin v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, to continue jurisdiction over [an applicant], it was necessary to show that he had a mental disease or defect, which was in remission at the time of the hearing
• holding that, to continue jurisdiction over [an applicant], it was necessary to show that he had a mental disease or defect, which was in remission at the time of the hearing
• holding that, to continue jurisdiction over the petitioner, it was necessary to show that he had a mental disease or defect, which was in remission at the time of the hearing
• declining the petitioner's invitation to weigh the evidence anew because that task is \exclusively within the province of [the agency]\
• “PSRB does not count the witnesses; it weighs the evidence”
• “PSRB does not count the witnesses; it weighs the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).