S.D. Florida· 12/23/2013
Rojas v. Garda CL Southeast, Inc.
Citations
- 297 F.R.D. 669
- 25 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 891
- 2013 WL 6834657
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179595
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the limitations period for opt-ins runs from the time of the filing of their written consents, and not from the time that they receive notice”
- granting conditional certification where 14 employees indicated their desire to join the litigation by filing notices and plaintiff asserted he had personal knowledge that others were interested in opting in
- declining to grant equitable tolling where no evidence supported plaintiffs’ “conclusory assertion” that some opt-in plaintiffs' claims will be entirely barred but for thirty-one days of equitable tolling and no showing of extraordinary circumstances.”
- “[P]laintiffs’ allegation of ‘willfulness’ is not a mere conclusory allegation, and the facts of the case support providing notice based on a limitations period of three years.”
- “While notice of collective action could be posted in employer's work locations, plaintiffs were not to send “reminder” notice, and employer was to provide potential opt-ins' contact information directly to plaintiffs rather than third party administrator.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosenbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 3,247×
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court· 1990-01-09· cited 1,715×
- Hipp v. Liberty National Life InsuranceEleventh Circuit· 2001-05-29· cited 468×
- Morgan v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2008-12-16· cited 415×
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Eleventh Circuit· 1996-04-09· cited 329×
- Joanie Dybach v. State of Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 1991-09-30· cited 293×
- Roger Justice v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1993-11-15· cited 274×
- Turlington v. Atlanta Gas Light Co.Eleventh Circuit· 1998-02-26· cited 161×
- Downs v. McNeilEleventh Circuit· 2008-03-24· cited 158×
- Lessie Anderson v. Cagle's, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2007-06-11· cited 146×
- Cameron-Grant v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 2003-10-20· cited 99×
- Colson v. Avnet, Inc.D. Arizona· 2010-01-27· cited 56×
- Resendiz-Ramirez v. P & H FORESTRY, LLCW.D. Arkansas· 2007-09-27· cited 46×
- Abelardo Baez, Angel Baez v. Wells Fargo Armored Service Corp., a Corp. Doing Business in the State of FloridaEleventh Circuit· 1991-08-09· cited 42×
- White v. Osmose, Inc.M.D. Alabama· 2002-05-13· cited 39×
- Opelika Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. GoldbergFifth Circuit· 1962-01-25· cited 36×
- Stone v. First Union Corp.S.D. Florida· 2001-09-04· cited 33×
- Davis v. Charoen Pokphand (USA), Inc.M.D. Alabama· 2004-02-11· cited 32×
- Smallwood v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyN.D. Illinois· 2010-05-06· cited 29×
- Lima v. International Catastrophe Solutions, Inc.E.D. Louisiana· 2007-06-27· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.