Skip to main content
· 11/15/1993

Roger Justice v. United States

Citations

  • 6 F.3d 1474
  • 1994 A.M.C. 317
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 29481
  • 1993 WL 434724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that petitioner was not entitled to equitable relief because he failed to exercise due diligence
  • recognizing that an involuntary dismissal without prejudice constitutes a final order for purposes of Rule 60(b)
  • recognizing that an involuntary dismissal without prejudice constitutes a final order for purposes of Rule 60(b)
  • holding that dismissal without prejudice is tantamount to dismissal with prejudice when claims would be barred by statute of limitations
  • noting that \traditional principles of equity jurisprudence\ are appropriate in reaching a decision on equitable tolling
  • noting that “traditional principles of equity jurisprudence” are appropriate in reaching a decision on equitable tolling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Cox, Hobbs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.