Skip to main content
· 1/27/2010

Colson v. Avnet, Inc.

Citations

  • 687 F. Supp. 2d 914
  • 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1739
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12620
  • 2010 WL 339047

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the plaintiff’s Oregon 20 state-law overtime claim “essentially seeks to piggy-back thirty days’ wages worth of 21 waiting-time penalties onto any alleged FLSA violation”
  • denying certification of nationwide class of both sales-management representatives and those who perform “substantially the same duties as sales management representatives” because the evidentiary showing that these employees performed the same job duties was “plainly insufficient”
  • declaration referencing 1 discussions with “unidentified” coworkers, “unspecified” company communications, and 2 “undocumented” employee interactions was insufficient for conditional certification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mary H. Murguia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.