Surrency v. Harbison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an assault claim was for a jury to decide, while affirming the direction of a verdict on an outrage claim
• affirming directed verdict for defendants on outrageous conduct claims where plaintiff alleged co-employee defendant committed assault and battery, and made derogatory statements and threats

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).