Paxton v. Crabtree

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \we have adopted federal precedent when we believed it was compatible with our human rights statute\
• observing that “we have adopted federal precedent when we believed it was compatible with our human rights statute”
• observing that “we have adopted federal precedent when we believed it was compatible with our human rights statute”
• observing that \we have adopted federal precedent when we believed it was compatible with our human rights statute\
• noting that “we have adopted federal precedent when we believed it was compatible with our human rights statute”
• \It does appear in the context of a civil rights discrimination case that courts have used common law master-servant principles to determine whether there is an employer-employee relationship.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).