Sydenstricker v. Mohan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that doctrine of judicial estoppel could not be applied to prevent a party from pleading alternative defenses because Rule 8(e)(2) permitted this
• holding that doctrine of judicial estoppel could not be applied to prevent a party from pleading alternative defenses because Rule 8(e)(2) permitted this
• the defense of intervening cause can be established based on evidence that shows “the negligence of another party or a nonparty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).