Skip to main content

Rogers v. State

Citations

  • 796 So. 2d 1022
  • 2001 WL 1137366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that prosecutors may comment upon any facts introduced into evidence and may draw whatever deductions and inferences that seem proper from the facts
  • any error in not allowing defendant to impeach the witness with this prior conviction was harmless as testimony demonstrated witness’s extensive drug use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McRae

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.