Skip to main content

Austin v. State

Citations

  • 784 So. 2d 186
  • 2001 WL 463340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “evidence of flight is inadmissible when independent reasons exist to explain the flight”
  • noting, for example, circumstances where defendant was an escapee, or driving a stolen car, or leaving the scene of the alleged crime based on threats from another person or from potential danger from the victim
  • noting, for example, circumstances where defendant was an escapee, or driving a stolen car, or leaving the scene of the alleged crime based on threats from another person or from potential danger from the victim
  • “Matters regarding the weight and credibility of evidence must be resolved by the jury.”
  • admission of flight evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pittman, C.J., Smith and Easley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.