· 9/11/2003
McGowen v. State
Citations
- 859 So. 2d 320
- 2003 WL 22098007
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “[t]he purpose of a closing argument is to fairly sum up the evidence
- the Sixth Amendment does not require confrontation with the particular analyst who conducted the test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carlson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.