Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implying that such polling before an Allen instruction may be per se reversible error
• noting that while a trial court has great discretion in ruling on a read-back request, the discretion cannot be properly exercised without knowing the nature of the request
• noting that while a trial court has great discretion in ruling on a read-back request, the diseretion cannot be properly exercised without knowing the nature of the request
• judge's comment to jury that it had been deliberating for almost three hours over a three-witness case was fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-09-30· cited 130×
• McKinney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-27· cited 22×
• Gahley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-30· cited 22×
• Scoggins v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-01-21· cited 20×
• Scoggins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-23· cited 16×
• Gregorio Jimenez v. E.R. Myers, Warden Attorney General of California
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-12-08· cited 12×
• Gormady v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-20· cited 1×
• Cooper v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-13

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brasfield v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1926-11-22· cited 490×
• State v. Wells
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-03-02· cited 112×
• Warren v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-09-09· cited 21×
• Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers, Local No. 391 v. Terry
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 13×
• DeCastro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-07-11· cited 10×
• Shelton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-26· cited 8×