Skip to main content

Scoggins v. State

Citations

  • 726 So. 2d 762
  • 1999 WL 20560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that fundamental error is error that reaches down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error
  • eourt’s knowledge of jury’s numerical division does not require reversal where totality of circumstances does not show a coercive influence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anstead

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.