Skip to main content

Warren v. State

Citations

  • 498 So. 2d 472
  • 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that emphasizing the \needless cost involved in retrying the case\ was a strictly forbidden comment in Florida
  • court emphasized the \needless cost in retrying the case in the event of a hung jury\
  • [An Allen] charge is derived from the case of Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896
  • “Generally speaking, an objection is required in these cases in order to preserve for appellate review the propriety of the trial court’s ‘Allen’ charge....”
  • judge's comments that he did not wish to try the case again, that retrial would be very costly and that he sincerely hoped the jury would return a verdict if at all possible infected the integrity of the fact finding process and constituted fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Hubbart and Nesbitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.