E.D. North Carolina· 6/13/1994
Rodger v. Electronic Data Systems, Corp.
Citations
- 155 F.R.D. 537
- 2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1436
- 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 674
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15278
- 1994 WL 265102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A trial court should not permit ‘fishing expeditions’ conducted by plaintiffs, even in a discrimination case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schaaf v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.E.D. North Carolina· 2005-12-22· cited 30×
- Coker v. Duke & Co.M.D. Alabama· 1998-02-20· cited 23×
- Glenn v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia· 2002-09-03· cited 22×
- Cason v. Builders Firstsource-Southeast Group, Inc.W.D. North Carolina· 2001-08-30· cited 11×
- McDougal-Wilson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.E.D. North Carolina· 2005-05-24· cited 9×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court· 1978-06-19· cited 2,321×
- Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.First Circuit· 1989-03-28· cited 811×
- Vernon EARLEY and Garey Noe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORP., Defendant-AppelleeEleventh Circuit· 1990-08-02· cited 648×
- Arthur Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co.Second Circuit· 1990-01-30· cited 331×
- Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.Tenth Circuit· 1975-08-01· cited 276×
- Maureen E. Coughlin and Frank S. Mistretta v. Harry Lee A/K/A Jefferson Parish SheriffFifth Circuit· 1991-11-12· cited 182×
- Paul Silvestre Diaz v. American Telephone & TelegraphNinth Circuit· 1985-01-29· cited 156×
- Miller v. Doctor's General HospitalW.D. Oklahoma· 1977-08-17· cited 72×
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO, Defendant-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1974-10-30· cited 65×
- Department of Transportation v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1987-03-23· cited 45×
- McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-12-12· cited 43×
- Ardrey v. United Parcel ServiceFourth Circuit· 1986-08-18· cited 43×
- Robbins v. Camden City Board of EducationD. New Jersey· 1985-01-22· cited 41×
- Marshall v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1978-07-12· cited 34×
- Hardrick v. Legal Services Corp.District of Columbia· 1983-02-03· cited 26×
- Witten v. A.H. Smith & Co.D. Maryland· 1984-01-03· cited 18×
- Prouty v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District of Columbia· 1983-07-06· cited 16×
- Flanagan v. Travelers InsuranceW.D. New York· 1986-06-25· cited 13×
- Morrison v. City & County of DenverD. Colorado· 1978-11-01· cited 9×
- Hinton v. Entex Inc.E.D. Texas· 1981-09-23· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.