Arthur Hollander v. American Cyanamid Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that discovery request that “goes beyond the narrow confines of the [] facility in which [plaintiff] worked ... is relevant” to discrimination claim
• holding that plaintiff failed to establish causation where three-and-a-half months passed between the protected activity and the adverse employment action
• holding that the passage of three (3) months was too long to suggest a causal,relationship in a First Amendment retaliation claim
• concluding that a period of three-and-a-half-months between a protected activity and the employer's adverse action failed to establish a causal connection
• concluding that a period of 12 three-and-a-half-months between a protected activity and the employer’s adverse action failed to 13 establish a causal connection
• holding that the passage of three months between plaintiff’s complaint and the alleged adverse action is too long to suggest a causal relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).