Skip to main content
· 9/14/1993

Rochlis v. Walt Disney Co.

Citations

  • 19 Cal. App. 4th 201
  • 23 Cal. Rptr. 2d 793
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 12744
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7515
  • 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Criticism of job performance and inadequate 19 compensation, even a demotion or reduction in pay . . ., are not grounds for a constructive 20 discharge.”
  • “promises to pay salary 21 increases or bonuses which are ‘appropriate’ to [plaintiff’s] responsibilities and performance . . 22 .are not capable of enforcement in a court of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Croskey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.