· 3/16/1995
Williams v. Wraxall
Citations
- 33 Cal. App. 4th 120
- 39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 658
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 3405
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1992
- 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “where ... the meaning of the agreement is ambiguous, its construction is a fact issue to be presented to the jury to resolve.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newsom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.