Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/14/2016
Robertson v. State
Citations
- 418 S.C. 505
- 795 S.E.2d 29
- 2016 S.C. LEXIS 402
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing a successive PCR application where PCR counsel was not statutorily qualified to represent the applicant
- \The South Carolina Legislature enacted the Uniform Post- Conviction Procedure Act to govern all aspects of PCR . . . .\
- successive application permitted because original post-conviction counsel was not qualified under state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Kittredge, Hearn, Pleicones, Toal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court· 2003-02-25· cited 27,550×
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 4,115×
- Maples v. ThomasSupreme Court· 2012-01-18· cited 724×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- Charleston County School District v. State Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-07-19· cited 73×
- Aice v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 71×
- William Dwayne Salter v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2015-06-02· cited 53×
- South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-04-03· cited 49×
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-06-20· cited 44×
- Tucker v. CatoeFourth Circuit· 2000-06-13· cited 44×
- Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-06-29· cited 35×
- Franklin v. CatoeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-27· cited 33×
- Fairchild v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-04-11· cited 25×
- Aeschliman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-01-14· cited 24×
- Odom v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-15· cited 24×
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-09· cited 16×
- Case v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-03-10· cited 15×
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-12· cited 15×
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-02-06· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.