Case v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing a successive PCR application where the applicant's first PCR application was dismissed without the assistance of legal counsel and without a hearing
• court permitted a successive application where the applicant’s first PCR application was filed without the benefit of counsel and was dismissed without a hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matthews v. Evatt
  Fourth Circuit· 1997-01-28· cited 234×
• Aice v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 71×
• Estrada v. Witkowski
  D. South Carolina· 1993-03-10· cited 53×
• Odom v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-15· cited 24×
• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-09· cited 16×
• Washington v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-11-12· cited 15×
• Robertson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-12-14· cited 7×
• Brannon v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-06-25· cited 5×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rogers v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-10-09· cited 8×
• Delaney v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-10-31· cited 5×