Skip to main content

State v. Murray

Citations

  • 51 So. 3d 593
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 26
  • 2011 WL 42890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the implied consent law under § 316.1933(1)(a) does not apply if a defendant consents to the blood sample
  • holding that because the implied consent law did not apply, the troopers were not required to inform the defendant of the provisions of implied consent
  • “Here, [the defendants] were not under lawful arrest and did not seek medical treatment, and the troopers did not have probable cause to believe that they were impaired. Consequently, the implied consent law was clearly not implicated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger, Monaco, Griffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.