Skip to main content

Robertson v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 406 S.E.2d 417
  • 12 Va. App. 854
  • 8 Va. Law Rep. 80
  • 1991 Va. App. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that without evidence of mishandling, the Commonwealth does not need to present testimony from mail carriers to satisfy chain of custody for sealed evidence
  • stating that in order to disregard a witness' testimony as a matter of law, the evidence must be inherently incredible or the witness' account of the events must be unworthy of belief
  • “In the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts may presume that public officers have properly discharged their official duties.”
  • chain of custody established when police sealed evidence, mailed it through postal service, and lab received it sealed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Robertson v. Commonwealth

20 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.