Skip to main content

Lilly v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 647 S.E.2d 517
  • 50 Va. App. 173
  • 2007 Va. App. LEXIS 282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in the defendant’s trial for driving as a habitual offender, information about the mandatory minimum sentence and the partial repeal of the habitual offender statute was not relevant to the factual issues before the jury
  • stating that federal due process principles “subsume any analysis of parallel provisions in the Virginia Constitution”
  • rejecting the defendant’s claim that due process entitled her to a jury instruction about the mandatory minimum sentence in the guilt phase of trial
  • “‘[S]pecification of punishments’ [are] matters ordinarily understood as ‘peculiarly questions of legislative policy.’” (emphasis added
  • sketching the law’s statutory history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: D. Arthur Kelsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.