Gilmore v. Landsidle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[i]n the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, [an appellate court] must presume that a public officer has properly discharged his official duties”
• “In the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, this Court must presume that a public officer has properly discharged his official duties.”
• “In the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, this Court must presume that a public officer has properly discharged his official duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).