Robertson v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Sixth Amendment does not require that everyone involved in the preparation of an exhibit testify as a witness at trial. Neither does the Confrontation Clause demand that everyone whose testimony might be relevant be required to testify.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cortez-Rivas v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2022-02-03
• Daniel Torres Cruz, Sometimes Known as Daniel Torres-Cruz v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2025-05-20

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Ohio v. Roberts
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
• Davis v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
• Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
  Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 2,882×
• Bullcoming v. New Mexico
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 1,225×
• Williams v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-18· cited 994×
• Crawford v. Com.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2011-01-13· cited 95×
• United States v. Ignasiak
  Eighth Circuit· 2012-01-19· cited 87×
• United States v. Summers
  Fourth Circuit· 2011-12-16· cited 52×
• Anderson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-09-12· cited 46×
• United States v. Turner
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-01-12· cited 38×
• United States v. Ramos-Gonzalez
  First Circuit· 2011-12-09· cited 30×
• Aguilar v. Com.
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2010-09-16· cited 28×
• Crawford v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-12-29· cited 22×
• LaMarques Devon McWilliams v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-04-24· cited 9×
• Robertson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2012-09-11· cited 4×
• Robertson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2012-10-23· cited 2×