Skip to main content
· 11/23/1982

Roberts v. Morgensen Motors

Citations

  • 659 P.2d 1307
  • 135 Ariz. 162
  • 35 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 836
  • 1982 Ariz. App. LEXIS 650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that while the seller could properly limit the remedy, “this remedy is no longer exclusive where the circumstances cause this exclusive or limited remedy to fail of its essential purpose.”
  • discussing former Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure 59(a)(3) and 60(c)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Greer, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.