Ashton v. Sierrita Mining and Ranching

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating evidence that “was in possession of the party before the judgment was rendered . . . is not newly discovered and does not entitle him to relief” (quoting 11 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2859 (1973)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boatman v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-11-27· cited 21×
• Lake Havasu Resort v. COMMERCIAL LOAN INS.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-10-27· cited 17×
• Roberts v. Morgensen Motors
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-11-23· cited 17×
• Delbridge v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-11-08· cited 16×
• Marriage of Andrews v. Andrews
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-05-29· cited 13×
• Matos v. City of Phoenix
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-01-26· cited 10×
• Lake Havasu Resort, Inc. v. Commercial Loan Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-10-27· cited 10×
• Delbridge v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-11-08· cited 1×
• Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-07-18
• Laveen Meadows v. Mejia
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-05-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lowenthal v. Tcherepnin
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-04· cited 104×
• Modla v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-04-06· cited 33×
• Ayers v. Genter
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1962-09-20· cited 26×
• Industrial Park Corp. v. U. S. I. F. Palo Verde Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-03-15· cited 12×