Fifth Circuit· 10/2/2001

Roberts v. Cardinal Services, Inc.

Citations

266 F.3d 368
2002 A.M.C. 83
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21256
2001 WL 1082538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a conjunctive test requires a showing on all elements of the test
discussing that a plugging and abandonment worker injured by a perforation gun attached to a wireline was not a seaman
holding that although plaintiff came “quite 14 While CTS responds that their records do take these items into account and that its records are accurate and complete (Doc. 24 at 2), there remains a genuine issue of material fact. close (27.7 percent
explaining that “when a group of vessels is at issue, a worker who aspires to seaman status must show that at least 30 percent of his time was spent on vessels, every one of which was under his defendant-employer’s common ownership or control.”
requiring plugging-and-abandoning offshore oil platform crewman to show substantial temporal connection
court must view all facts and evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Smith, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Roberts v. Cardinal Services, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.