Skip to main content
· 3/19/1984

Jerome D. Wallace v. Oceaneering International, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee, and Cities Service Company v. Zapata Offshore Co.

Citations

  • 727 F.2d 427
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that the central issue germane to operational control is control over the manner of performance
  • indicating that the central issue germane to operational control is control over the manner of performance
  • holding plaintiff was a seaman because, as a diver, he performed a traditional maritime task and faced inherently maritime perils
  • master service agreement governed work performed “under subsequent verbal and/or written work orders, at all times”
  • “[Tjime spent on a crew boat in transit” and “working on the Drake dry-docked [dive] vessel” might apply in calculating the 30 percent requirement
  • length of service is not important

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Goldberg, Hig-Ginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.