Alexander v. Express Energy Services Operating, L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs work on platforms, even when vessels were near the platforms, did not qualify under Chan-dris’s temporal connection prong as actually working on a vessel
• “To maintain a cause of action under the Jones Act, the plaintiff must be a seaman. Land-based workers are not seamen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).