Skip to main content
· 1/3/2013

Robert Gessert v. United States

Citations

  • 703 F.3d 1028
  • 2013 WL 28259
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 59
  • 111 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the claims do “not meet the [timing] requirements of the statute,” despite headnotes that describe it as a jurisdictional defect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Flaum, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.