· 1/3/2013
Robert Gessert v. United States
Citations
- 703 F.3d 1028
- 2013 WL 28259
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 59
- 111 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the claims do “not meet the [timing] requirements of the statute,” despite headnotes that describe it as a jurisdictional defect
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Flaum, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.