· 12/3/2013
Craig v. Rich Township High School District 227
Citations
- 736 F.3d 1110
- 37 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 671
- 2013 WL 6235856
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “heckler’s veto” can‐ not be used to silence unpopular speech
- concluding book written by school guidance counselor was entitled to minimal protection under Pickering
- referring to “heckler’s veto” in which unpopular speech is prohibited on account of community’s possible reaction
- referring to “heckler’s veto” in which unpopular speech is prohibited on account of community’s possible reaction
- rejecting a Fifth Amendment due process claim against a local school district because “the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment restrains only the actions of the federal government”
- focusing on whether employee’s speech would prevent him from being effective at his job
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kanne, Williams, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.