Skip to main content
· 12/3/2013

Craig v. Rich Township High School District 227

Citations

  • 736 F.3d 1110
  • 37 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 671
  • 2013 WL 6235856
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “heckler’s veto” can‐ not be used to silence unpopular speech
  • concluding book written by school guidance counselor was entitled to minimal protection under Pickering
  • referring to “heckler’s veto” in which unpopular speech is prohibited on account of community’s possible reaction
  • referring to “heckler’s veto” in which unpopular speech is prohibited on account of community’s possible reaction
  • rejecting a Fifth Amendment due process claim against a local school district because “the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment restrains only the actions of the federal government”
  • focusing on whether employee’s speech would prevent him from being effective at his job

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Williams, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.