Skip to main content

Ritter v. State

Citations

  • 885 So. 2d 413
  • 2004 WL 2309967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sentencing error should have been identified and addressed by appellate counsel pursuant to rule 3.800(b)(2)
  • holding that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue on appeal that the trial court impermissibly considered the fact that the defendant maintained his innocence before imposing sentence
  • holding that reliance on lack of remorse violates due process
  • finding ineffective assistance based on appellate counsel’s failure to raise due process violation when court had considered criminal defendant’s assertion of innocence at sentencing
  • remanding sentence where court impermissibly considered defendant’s privilege to exercise his right against self-incrimination
  • reversing a sentence after a jury trial and concluding that “it is constitutionally impermissible ... to consider the fact that a defendant continues to maintain his innocence and is unwilling to admit guilt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.