Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 123 So. 3d 701
  • 2013 WL 5777830
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the trial court erred in accepting as fact the State’s argument that the murder was over drugs
  • “In order to establish prejudice, petitioner need only show that the trial court’s order undermines confidence that the sentence was correctly imposed.”
  • “[A] sentence based on mere allegation or surmise violates the fundamental constitutional rights of the defendant.”
  • appellate counsel may be deemed ineffective for failing to file such a motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Clark, Only, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.